VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VCPA.L (Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating) and VWRL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - VCPA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VWRL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VCPA.L returned -59.47%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for VWRL.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCPA.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for VWRL.L.

Performance

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCPA.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.L's 11.87% return.

VCPA.L

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: -98.93%
• 3Y*: -77.87%
• 5Y*: -59.47%
• 10Y*: —

VWRL.L

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 29.86%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VCPA.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.51%	-99.00%	4.58%	2.13%	-4.89%	-0.13%	5.86%	10.80%
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing	11.87%	13.99%	19.59%	15.61%	-8.44%	20.04%	12.13%	13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VCPA.L and VWRL.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019	0.14

The correlation between VCPA.L and VWRL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCPA.L

VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

VWRL.L

VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VCPA.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	2.88	-3.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.93	3.96	-4.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.31	1.55	-1.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	4.20	-5.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	17.09	-18.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCPA.L and VWRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VCPA.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00	2.88	-3.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-1.32	0.97	-2.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.24	0.95	-2.19

Drawdowns

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCPA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than VWRL.L's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCPA.L and VWRL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCPA.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.06%	-24.98%	-74.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.02%	-7.08%	-91.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.04%	-17.48%	-81.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.04%	-17.48%	-81.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.03%	-0.48%	-98.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.55%	-3.30%	-14.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	81.78%	1.74%	+80.04%

Volatility

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) is 1.53%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that VCPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCPA.L	VWRL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	2.97%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	7.64%	-3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.63%	10.34%	+88.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.54%	12.86%	+32.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.64%	14.25%	+26.39%

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VCPA.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

VCPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VCPA.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing	1.24%	1.39%	1.49%	1.72%	2.03%	1.45%	1.58%	1.95%	2.22%	1.90%	1.85%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCPA.L and VWRL.L in my portfolio?

VCPA.L and VWRL.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VCPA.L or VWRL.L?

On fees, VCPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VCPA.L or VWRL.L?

VCPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.

What is the main difference between VCPA.L and VWRL.L?

VCPA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VWRL.L is Global Equities. VCPA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VCPA.L and 0.19% for VWRL.L.