PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VCPA.L is traded in GBP, while VDPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDPA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCPA.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than VDPA.L's 0.82% return.


VCPA.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.41%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.27%
1Y
-98.93%
3Y*
-77.87%
5Y*
-59.47%
10Y*

VDPA.L

1D
0.31%
1M
1.44%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.11%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VCPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.51%-99.00%4.58%2.13%-4.89%-0.13%5.86%10.80%
VDPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.82%0.10%4.62%2.65%-4.76%-0.27%5.94%10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VCPA.L and VDPA.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019

0.73

The correlation between VCPA.L and VDPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCPA.L
VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VDPA.L
VDPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCPA.LVDPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.31

1.17

-0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

1.28

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

3.26

-4.48

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCPA.L and VDPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCPA.LVDPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

0.96

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.32

0.20

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.24

0.24

-1.48

Drawdowns

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCPA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than VDPA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCPA.L and VDPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCPA.LVDPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.06%

-14.91%

-84.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.02%

-5.21%

-93.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.04%

-9.13%

-89.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.04%

-13.60%

-85.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.03%

-3.15%

-95.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.55%

-6.69%

-10.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

81.78%

2.04%

+79.74%

Volatility

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) is 1.53%, while Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that VCPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCPA.LVDPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.94%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

5.54%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.63%

6.94%

+91.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.54%

9.16%

+36.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.64%

10.60%

+30.04%

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCPA.L vs. VDPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VCPA.L nor VDPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VCPA.L and VDPA.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VCPA.L.

VCPA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VDPA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VCPA.L and 0.07% for VDPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCPA.L and VDPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer