PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VCPA.L is traded in GBP, while ERNA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ERNA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCPA.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than ERNA.L's 2.05% return.


VCPA.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.41%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.27%
1Y
-98.93%
3Y*
-77.87%
5Y*
-59.47%
10Y*

ERNA.L

1D
0.11%
1M
1.27%
YTD
2.05%
6M
1.25%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
2.56%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VCPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.51%-99.00%4.58%2.13%-4.89%-0.13%5.86%10.80%
ERNA.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.05%-2.72%7.51%0.22%13.52%1.06%-1.70%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VCPA.L and ERNA.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019

0.53

The correlation between VCPA.L and ERNA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCPA.L
VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNA.L
ERNA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCPA.LERNA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.31

1.14

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

1.05

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

2.88

-4.09

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCPA.L and ERNA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCPA.LERNA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

0.82

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.32

0.58

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.24

0.33

-1.57

Drawdowns

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCPA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than ERNA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCPA.L and ERNA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCPA.LERNA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.06%

-15.54%

-83.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.02%

-5.06%

-93.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.04%

-9.68%

-89.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.04%

-15.54%

-83.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.03%

-4.46%

-94.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.55%

-6.91%

-10.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

81.78%

1.86%

+79.92%

Volatility

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) is 1.53%, while iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that VCPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCPA.LERNA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.82%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

4.89%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.63%

6.50%

+92.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.54%

8.42%

+37.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.64%

8.73%

+31.91%

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VCPA.L and ERNA.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCPA.L vs. ERNA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VCPA.L nor ERNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VCPA.L and ERNA.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCPA.L and ERNA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VCPA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ERNA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCPA.L and ERNA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer