PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCLT vs. IGSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCLT vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCLT achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than IGSB's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, VCLT has underperformed IGSB with an annualized return of 2.26%, while IGSB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.71% annualized return.


VCLT

1D
0.23%
1M
1.54%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.27%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
-2.17%
10Y*
2.26%

IGSB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCLT vs. IGSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.50%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.75%6.96%4.97%6.40%-5.63%-0.56%5.37%7.11%1.25%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VCLT and IGSB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.55

Over the past year, VCLT and IGSB have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCLT vs. IGSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IGSB
IGSB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IGSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCLT vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCLTIGSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.82

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

11.30

-8.34

VCLT vs. IGSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the IGSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCLT and IGSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCLT vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCLT drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than IGSB's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLT and IGSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCLTIGSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-13.38%

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

-1.46%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-1.46%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

-9.46%

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

-13.38%

-20.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.92%

-0.28%

-13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-0.85%

-7.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.36%

+1.81%

Volatility

VCLT vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.69%. This indicates that VCLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCLTIGSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

0.69%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.83%

1.50%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

1.95%

+5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

2.94%

+9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.85%

3.47%

+9.38%

VCLT vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IGSB's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCLT vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison

VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than IGSB's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.44%4.02%3.26%2.07%1.82%2.36%3.06%2.46%1.65%1.45%1.18%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.52%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCLT and IGSB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCLT has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to IGSB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLT dropped -34.31% vs IGSB's -13.38%.

On 10-year performance, IGSB leads with 2.71% vs 2.26% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IGSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGSB has performed better with a 2.71% return vs 2.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IGSB.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 4.58% for IGSB.

VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index, while IGSB tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VCLT and 0.04% for IGSB.

IGSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCLT and IGSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer