VCLN vs. DBO
VCLN (Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VCLN is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. VCLN is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VCLN returned 20.62%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCLN charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
VCLN vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCLN achieves a 39.16% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
VCLN
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 11.34%
- YTD
- 39.16%
- 6M
- 37.23%
- 1Y
- 95.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
VCLN vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF | 39.16% | 55.75% | -6.69% | -17.54% | -7.87% | -5.00% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 10.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCLN and DBO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between VCLN and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VCLN vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCLN
DBO
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
VCLN
DBO
-
Industrials
VCLN
DBO
-
Technology
VCLN
DBO
-
Energy
VCLN
DBO
-
Basic Materials
VCLN
-
DBO
-
Communication Services
VCLN
-
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCLN
-
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
VCLN
-
DBO
-
Financial Services
VCLN
-
DBO
Healthcare
VCLN
-
DBO
-
Real Estate
VCLN
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCLN vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
VCLN
DBO
VCLN vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCLN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.66 | 4.44 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.03 | 9.02 | +20.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCLN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 2.34 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.02 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
VCLN vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCLN drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLN and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCLN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -90.18% | +44.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -18.19% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.25% | -28.20% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -51.38% | +50.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.09% | -62.25% | +38.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 8.92% | -5.61% |
Volatility
VCLN vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) is 9.04%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that VCLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCLN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 12.61% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.11% | 28.20% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.22% | 34.46% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 32.29% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 31.78% | -4.35% |
VCLN vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCLN has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCLN vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
VCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF | 1.45% | 2.01% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCLN and DBO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to VCLN (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLN dropped -45.66% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 20.62% for VCLN. On fees, VCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, VCLN has been the lower-risk option at 9.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 20.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.45% for VCLN.
VCLN is categorized as Sustainable, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VCLN and 0.78% for DBO.
VCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCLN and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer