PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCEB vs. SCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCEB vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCEB achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's 0.37% return.


VCEB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.74%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*

SCHI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.68%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.50%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCEB vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
0.51%7.48%2.23%8.52%-15.15%-1.99%2.45%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.37%9.47%3.32%8.97%-14.06%-1.85%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VCEB and SCHI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.96

The correlation between VCEB and SCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCEB vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCEB
VCEB Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VCEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VCEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCEB vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCEBSCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.76

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

5.66

-0.69

VCEB vs. SCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the SCHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCEB and SCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCEB vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCEB drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHI drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCEB and SCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCEBSCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-20.67%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-3.01%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-6.14%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-20.67%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-1.19%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-5.68%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.94%

0.00%

Volatility

VCEB vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) have volatilities of 1.21% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCEBSCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.25%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

3.20%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

4.14%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

6.67%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.64%

7.38%

-0.74%

VCEB vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCEB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCEB vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison

VCEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than SCHI's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.04%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
4.64%4.57%4.47%3.70%2.84%1.69%0.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VCEB and SCHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHI has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to VCEB (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCEB dropped -21.60% vs SCHI's -20.67%.

On 5-year performance, SCHI leads with 1.19% vs 0.36% for VCEB. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHI has performed better with a 1.19% return vs 0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VCEB.

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.64% for VCEB.

VCEB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corp SRI Select Index, while SCHI tracks Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCEB and 0.03% for SCHI.

SCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCEB and SCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer