VBR vs. TSCV
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. VBR is passively managed, while TSCV is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.
Performance
VBR vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than TSCV's 21.01% return.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
TSCV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBR vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 13.42% | 3.59% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 21.01% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and TSCV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VBR vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBR | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBR vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and TSCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -10.17% | -51.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | 0.00% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -1.95% | -6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility
VBR vs. TSCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 16.73% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 16.73% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 16.73% | +5.02% |
VBR vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBR vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than TSCV's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VBR and TSCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.60% for TSCV.
Find the right allocation for VBR and TSCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer