VBR vs. FDGRX
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) are both funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. VBR is passively managed, while FDGRX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.76%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for FDGRX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FDGRX.
Performance
VBR vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 22.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.23% annualized return.
VBR
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 27.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
FDGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 22.31%
- 6M
- 20.57%
- 1Y
- 46.04%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 23.23%
VBR vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.51% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 22.31% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and FDGRX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VBR and FDGRX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VBR vs. FDGRX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
FDGRX
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
VBR
FDGRX
Financial Services
VBR
FDGRX
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
FDGRX
Technology
VBR
FDGRX
Real Estate
VBR
FDGRX
Healthcare
VBR
FDGRX
Basic Materials
VBR
FDGRX
Energy
VBR
FDGRX
Utilities
VBR
FDGRX
-
Consumer Defensive
VBR
FDGRX
Communication Services
VBR
FDGRX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
FDGRX
VBR vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBR | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.60 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 13.24 | -2.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBR vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and FDGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -71.62% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -12.60% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -26.19% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -40.25% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -40.25% | -5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.17% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -15.89% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.42% | -0.92% |
Volatility
VBR vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 4.41%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 7.29% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 15.82% | -5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 19.47% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 24.09% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 23.47% | -1.72% |
VBR vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBR vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBR and FDGRX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDGRX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to VBR (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.
FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and FDGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer