VBND vs. IMTB
VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - VBND tracks the Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index while IMTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VBND returned -0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IMTB. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMTB.
Performance
VBND vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's -0.69% return.
VBND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.54%
IMTB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.15M | $1.45M | $1.46M | |
| $846.73K | $2.16M | $1.29M |
VBND vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | -0.59% | 7.31% | 1.26% | 8.16% | -14.18% | -0.43% | 5.37% | 9.50% | -0.96% | 3.15% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | -0.69% | 8.88% | 1.94% | 6.10% | -12.75% | -1.41% | 6.25% | 8.62% | -0.45% | 4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBND and IMTB is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VBND and IMTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBND vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank
VBND
IMTB
VBND vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.27 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | 3.27 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBND vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and IMTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -18.15% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.86% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.60% | -5.83% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.84% | -18.05% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.40% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -4.09% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.11% | -0.02% |
Volatility
VBND vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) is 1.01%, while iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that VBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 1.10% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 3.29% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 4.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 6.32% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 5.17% | +0.28% |
VBND vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBND vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than IMTB's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.18% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.35% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBND and IMTB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMTB has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to VBND (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs IMTB's -18.15%.
On 5-year performance, IMTB leads with 0.15% vs -0.19% for VBND. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IMTB has performed better with a 0.15% return vs -0.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.
VBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 4.18% for IMTB.
VBND tracks Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.06% for IMTB.
IMTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBND and IMTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer