VBND vs. COMT
VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. VBND is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBND returned 1.59%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for COMT. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
VBND vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VBND has underperformed COMT with an annualized return of 1.59%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.79% annualized return.
VBND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
COMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 37.50%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
VBND vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 0.42% | 7.31% | 1.26% | 8.16% | -14.18% | -0.43% | 5.37% | 9.50% | -0.96% | 3.15% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 37.50% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 10.81% | -6.67% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBND and COMT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2014 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between VBND and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBND vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
VBND
COMT
VBND vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBND | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 5.70 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 13.42 | -8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBND | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.14 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.63 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.47 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.20 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VBND vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBND | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -51.89% | +32.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -8.02% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.60% | -13.31% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | -29.00% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | -39.22% | +20.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -6.30% | +5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -24.06% | +19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 3.40% | -2.35% |
Volatility
VBND vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) is 1.49%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that VBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBND | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 7.46% | -5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 18.88% | -15.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 21.36% | -17.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.11% | 21.07% | -14.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 18.89% | -13.44% |
VBND vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBND vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than COMT's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.63% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.23% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBND and COMT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to VBND (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 10-year performance, COMT leads with 8.79% vs 1.59% for VBND. On fees, VBND is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, VBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COMT has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 1.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBND is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 4.23% for VBND.
VBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vident and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBND and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer