VBND vs. APCB
VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. VBND is passively managed, while APCB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VBND returned 4.80%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for APCB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for APCB.
Performance
VBND vs. APCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than APCB's 0.50% return.
VBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
APCB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBND vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 0.55% | 7.31% | 1.26% | 3.94% |
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 0.50% | 6.87% | 1.45% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBND and APCB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VBND and APCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBND vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank
VBND
APCB
VBND vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBND | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.19 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.88 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 5.72 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBND | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.70 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
VBND vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than APCB's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and APCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBND | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -6.42% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.58% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.60% | -5.32% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.21% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -1.51% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.85% | +0.20% |
Volatility
VBND vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) at 1.22%. This indicates that VBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBND | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.22% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 2.43% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 3.42% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 4.84% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 4.84% | +0.61% |
VBND vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than APCB's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBND vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison
VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than APCB's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.35% | 4.74% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBND and APCB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBND has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to APCB (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs APCB's -6.42%.
On 3-year performance, VBND leads with 4.80% vs 4.03% for APCB. On fees, APCB is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, APCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VBND has performed better with a 4.80% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APCB is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.
APCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.22% for VBND.
They also come from different issuers: Vident and ActivePassive. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.36% for APCB.
APCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBND and APCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer