PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIUX vs. FSTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIUX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIUX achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FSTAX's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VBIUX has underperformed FSTAX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while FSTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.02% annualized return.


VBIUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
1.89%

FSTAX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.08%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.50%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBIUX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
-0.04%8.60%1.56%5.53%-13.24%-2.64%9.83%10.23%-0.13%3.90%
FSTAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A
3.19%8.68%4.93%8.82%-11.98%3.22%7.21%10.74%-2.94%7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VBIUX and FSTAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.52

The correlation between VBIUX and FSTAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIUX vs. FSTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIUX
VBIUX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VBIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTAX
FSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIUX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBIUXFSTAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.81

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

4.24

-2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.59

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.74

-2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.54

16.22

-11.68

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the FSTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIUX and FSTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBIUXFSTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.81

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.63

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.91

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.51

-0.04

Drawdowns

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIUX drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum FSTAX drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIUX and FSTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIUXFSTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-23.29%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-2.65%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-4.04%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-16.18%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.18%

-16.18%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

0.00%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-4.83%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.61%

+0.51%

Volatility

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIUX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIUXFSTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.35%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

2.89%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

3.54%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

4.49%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

4.44%

+0.94%

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIUX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBIUX vs. FSTAX - Dividend Comparison

VBIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FSTAX's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A
4.01%4.05%3.21%3.70%2.70%4.01%4.32%4.06%3.50%3.70%3.49%2.89%
VBIUX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
4.24%4.04%3.82%2.59%2.42%3.08%2.95%2.76%2.89%2.77%3.09%3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBIUX and FSTAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBIUX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to FSTAX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIUX dropped -19.18% vs FSTAX's -23.29%.

FSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIUX and FSTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer