PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIUX vs. FMSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIUX) and Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIUX achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FMSFX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, VBIUX has outperformed FMSFX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while FMSFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.


VBIUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
1.89%

FMSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.07%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBIUX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
-0.04%8.60%1.56%5.53%-13.24%-2.64%9.83%10.23%-0.13%3.90%
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
0.97%8.29%1.00%4.91%-12.61%-1.20%4.41%6.43%0.79%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VBIUX and FMSFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.86

The correlation between VBIUX and FMSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIUX vs. FMSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIUX
VBIUX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VBIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FMSFX
FMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIUX) and Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBIUXFMSFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.76

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

2.66

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.50

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.54

8.25

-3.71

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FMSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIUX and FMSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBIUXFMSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.76

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.03

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.25

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.02

-0.56

Drawdowns

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIUX drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FMSFX drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIUX and FMSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIUXFMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-18.81%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-2.81%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-8.04%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-18.66%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.18%

-18.81%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.11%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-1.92%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.85%

+0.27%

Volatility

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIUX) is 1.37%, while Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that VBIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIUXFMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.49%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

2.80%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

3.99%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.79%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

5.13%

+0.25%

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIUX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FMSFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBIUX vs. FMSFX - Dividend Comparison

VBIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FMSFX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
3.90%3.93%4.12%3.50%1.43%0.62%2.40%2.62%2.57%2.60%2.65%2.05%
VBIUX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
4.24%4.04%3.82%2.59%2.42%3.08%2.95%2.76%2.89%2.77%3.09%3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VBIUX and FMSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMSFX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to VBIUX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIUX dropped -19.18% vs FMSFX's -18.81%.

FMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIUX and FMSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer