PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIMX vs. VTBNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIMX achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VTBNX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, VBIMX has outperformed VTBNX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while VTBNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.


VBIMX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
1.89%

VTBNX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.25%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.33%8.59%1.55%5.78%-13.25%-2.50%9.83%10.22%-0.13%3.89%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.12%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%-0.27%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VBIMX and VTBNX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2016

0.96

The correlation between VBIMX and VTBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIMX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIMX
VBIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VBIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBIMXVTBNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.77

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

5.27

-1.04

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the VTBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIMX and VTBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBIMXVTBNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.02

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.31

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.37

+0.30

Drawdowns

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIMX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, roughly equal to the maximum VTBNX drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIMX and VTBNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIMXVTBNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.07%

-18.71%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-2.83%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-5.97%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-18.05%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.07%

-18.71%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-2.41%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-4.87%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.95%

+0.19%

Volatility

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) at 1.31%. This indicates that VBIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIMXVTBNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.31%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

2.78%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

3.92%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

5.96%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

4.93%

+0.45%

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIMX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBIMX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison

VBIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than VTBNX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.25%4.03%3.82%2.82%2.41%3.23%2.95%2.75%2.89%2.76%3.08%3.12%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.06%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VBIMX and VTBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBIMX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to VTBNX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIMX dropped -19.07% vs VTBNX's -18.71%.

VTBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIMX and VTBNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer