PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBF vs. PRPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBF vs. PRPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBF achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than PRPIX's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VBF has outperformed PRPIX with an annualized return of 2.94%, while PRPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.


VBF

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
2.94%

PRPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.85%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBF vs. PRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
-0.95%5.46%6.97%2.27%-17.77%-5.37%12.80%30.91%-11.16%13.35%
PRPIX
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund
0.40%9.66%4.02%9.47%-17.71%-0.76%7.87%15.77%-3.05%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VBF and PRPIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1996

0.18

Over the past year, VBF and PRPIX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBF vs. PRPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBF
VBF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPIX
PRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBF vs. PRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBFPRPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

1.94

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

2.94

-2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.36

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.46

-1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.52

8.53

-7.01

VBF vs. PRPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the PRPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBF and PRPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBFPRPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.94

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.15

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.46

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.87

-0.53

Drawdowns

VBF vs. PRPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBF drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than PRPIX's maximum drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBF and PRPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBFPRPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-24.24%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-3.29%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-6.30%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.23%

-24.24%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.23%

-24.24%

-7.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

-0.79%

-10.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-3.14%

-4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.95%

+0.51%

Volatility

VBF vs. PRPIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) at 1.45%. This indicates that VBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBFPRPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.45%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

3.08%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

4.17%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.38%

6.59%

+5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

6.02%

+6.71%

VBF vs. PRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBF vs. PRPIX - Dividend Comparison

VBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than PRPIX's 6.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRPIX
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund
6.28%6.30%5.97%4.72%2.42%5.61%3.82%5.47%3.47%3.95%3.20%4.23%
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
5.54%5.46%5.51%5.31%4.60%3.36%6.89%5.04%5.40%5.07%4.56%5.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBF and PRPIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBF has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to PRPIX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBF dropped -32.23% vs PRPIX's -24.24%.

PRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBF and PRPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer