PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBB vs. MIFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBB vs. MIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund (NBB) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBB achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than MIFIX's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, NBB has underperformed MIFIX with an annualized return of 2.50%, while MIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.


NBB

1D
0.33%
1M
-2.58%
6M
-1.26%
YTD
0.46%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
-1.51%
10Y*
2.50%
ALL TIME*
4.99%

MIFIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.06%
6M
4.54%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
4.94%
ALL TIME*
5.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$696.58K$686.40K$788.12K

NBB vs. MIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBB
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund
0.46%13.52%1.32%7.62%-24.60%0.91%14.45%19.48%-6.37%12.96%
MIFIX
Miller Intermediate Bond Fund
5.78%7.11%7.31%6.88%-7.72%4.32%14.22%9.79%-1.91%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between NBB and MIFIX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.18

Over the past year, NBB and MIFIX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBB vs. MIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBB
NBB Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBB Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MIFIX
MIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBB vs. MIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund (NBB) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBBMIFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.64

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.63

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

14.32

-12.61

NBB vs. MIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the MIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBB and MIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBB vs. MIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBB drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than MIFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBB and MIFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBBMIFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-15.58%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-2.68%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.39%

-5.10%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.51%

-11.87%

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

-15.58%

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-0.35%

-7.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-2.03%

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

0.68%

+1.77%

Volatility

NBB vs. MIFIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund (NBB) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) at 0.78%. This indicates that NBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBBMIFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.78%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

2.32%

+4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

3.10%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

4.93%

+8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.24%

5.40%

+8.84%

NBB vs. MIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MIFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBB vs. MIFIX - Dividend Comparison

NBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than MIFIX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIFIX
Miller Intermediate Bond Fund
4.36%4.59%4.08%3.60%3.62%5.87%5.16%2.36%5.16%3.90%1.48%1.78%
NBB
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund
7.61%7.33%6.96%8.33%7.86%5.50%4.67%5.54%6.38%5.62%6.35%6.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBB and MIFIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBB has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to MIFIX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBB dropped -33.51% vs MIFIX's -15.58%.

MIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBB and MIFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer