VBCJ vs. IGHG
VBCJ (Vanguard Target Maturity 2036 Corporate Bond ETF) and IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) are both Corporate Bonds funds - VBCJ tracks the ICE 2036 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while IGHG tracks the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBCJ charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IGHG.
Performance
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCJ
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCJ Vanguard Target Maturity 2036 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.19% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCJ and IGHG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCJ vs. IGHG — Risk / Return Rank
VBCJ
IGHG
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2036 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCJ) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCJ | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.53 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCJ drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum IGHG drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCJ and IGHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCJ | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -25.16% | +22.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -0.27% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -2.30% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.49% | — |
Volatility
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCJ | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.87% | 3.45% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 5.02% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 7.46% | -1.59% |
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCJ has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBCJ vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison
VBCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than IGHG's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.12% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
VBCJ Vanguard Target Maturity 2036 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCJ and IGHG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCJ is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCJ is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.
IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 0.91% for VBCJ.
VBCJ tracks ICE 2036 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCJ and 0.30% for IGHG.
Find the right allocation for VBCJ and IGHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer