PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAW vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAW vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 10.67%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.


VAW

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.70%
YTD
13.13%
6M
11.82%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.67%

VOOV

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
7.89%
6M
7.27%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
13.13%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.89%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VOOV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.84

The correlation between VAW and VOOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAW vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAW
VOOV

Basic Materials

90.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
11.1%

Industrials

1.1%
11.0%

Healthcare

0.5%
11.6%

Technology

0.1%
19.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
9.5%

Energy

0.0%
7.6%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

15.0%

Real Estate

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Basic Materials

VAW
90.1%
VOOV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VAW
8.3%
VOOV
11.1%

Industrials

VAW
1.1%
VOOV
11.0%

Healthcare

VAW
0.5%
VOOV
11.6%

Technology

VAW
0.1%
VOOV
19.0%

Consumer Defensive

VAW
0.0%
VOOV
9.5%

Energy

VAW
0.0%
VOOV
7.6%

Communication Services

VAW

-

VOOV
3.3%

Financial Services

VAW

-

VOOV
15.0%

Real Estate

VAW

-

VOOV
3.4%

Utilities

VAW

-

VOOV
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAW vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAWVOOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.43

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

13.00

-7.15

VAW vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAWVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-37.31%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-6.27%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-17.55%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-18.10%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-37.31%

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-0.92%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-3.83%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

1.65%

+2.57%

Volatility

VAW vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.94%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAWVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

2.94%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

7.36%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

9.98%

+8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

14.44%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

16.96%

+4.31%

VAW vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAW vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VOOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAW and VOOV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VOOV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 10-year performance, VOOV leads with 12.14% vs 10.67% for VAW. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VAW.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.

VAW is categorized as Materials, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAW and 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAW and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer