VAW vs. VOOV
VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 10.67%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for VOOV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VAW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOV.
Performance
VAW vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 10.67%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
VOOV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
VAW vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 13.13% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.89% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and VOOV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VAW and VOOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VAW vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAW
VOOV
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
VAW
VOOV
Consumer Cyclical
VAW
VOOV
Industrials
VAW
VOOV
Healthcare
VAW
VOOV
Technology
VAW
VOOV
Consumer Defensive
VAW
VOOV
Energy
VAW
VOOV
Communication Services
VAW
-
VOOV
Financial Services
VAW
-
VOOV
Real Estate
VAW
-
VOOV
Utilities
VAW
-
VOOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
VOOV
VAW vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VAW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.43 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 13.00 | -7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VAW vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VOOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -37.31% | -24.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -6.27% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -17.55% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -18.10% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -37.31% | -3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -0.92% | -2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -3.83% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 1.65% | +2.57% |
Volatility
VAW vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.94%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 2.94% | +3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 7.36% | +7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 9.98% | +8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 14.44% | +5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 16.96% | +4.31% |
VAW vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAW vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VOOV's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAW and VOOV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAW has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VOOV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VOOV's -37.31%.
On 10-year performance, VOOV leads with 12.14% vs 10.67% for VAW. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VAW.
VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.
VAW is categorized as Materials, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAW and 0.07% for VOOV.
VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAW and VOOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer