PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while LGAP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGAP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 32.17% return, which is significantly higher than LGAP.L's 8.82% return.


VAPX.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
-13.99%
6M
23.04%
YTD
32.17%
1Y
52.72%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
10.33%

LGAP.L

1D
-0.79%
1M
-2.17%
6M
5.38%
YTD
8.82%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
32.17%31.34%-3.50%3.89%-1.65%1.83%15.31%12.85%-1.10%
LGAP.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.82%12.35%6.50%-0.42%5.57%3.84%5.25%13.30%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VAPX.L and LGAP.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between VAPX.L and LGAP.L has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

LGAP.L
LGAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LGAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LGAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAPX.LLGAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.19

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.84

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

4.79

+5.97

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the LGAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAPX.L and LGAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LGAP.L drawdown of -32.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and LGAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAPX.LLGAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.88%

-32.02%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.88%

-7.06%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-17.57%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

-18.59%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.88%

-2.86%

-14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-5.98%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.71%

+2.18%

Volatility

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGAP.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAPX.LLGAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

3.00%

+10.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.15%

10.48%

+13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81%

12.70%

+13.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

15.20%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.53%

+0.50%

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LGAP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAPX.L vs. LGAP.L - Dividend Comparison

VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while LGAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGAP.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
2.09%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAPX.L and LGAP.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGAP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGAP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.

VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while LGAP.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.10% for LGAP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAPX.L and LGAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer