LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L
LGAP.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) and IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - LGAP.L tracks the L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF while IDFF.L tracks the iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGAP.L returned 5.54%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for IDFF.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGAP.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDFF.L.
Performance
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGAP.L achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 26.95% return.
LGAP.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
IDFF.L
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 48.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGAP.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 9.64% | 20.97% | 4.67% | 4.82% | -5.65% | 2.87% | 8.44% | 17.78% | -1.30% |
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 26.95% | 39.49% | 12.16% | 1.47% | -21.79% | -9.20% | 25.91% | 17.27% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGAP.L and IDFF.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LGAP.L and IDFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGAP.L
IDFF.L
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAP.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGAP.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 3.79 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 11.11 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGAP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -64.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGAP.L and IDFF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGAP.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.56% | -64.08% | +25.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -12.63% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -19.77% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -43.71% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -10.89% | +8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -18.18% | +10.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 4.32% | -1.11% |
Volatility
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAP.L) is 3.45%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that LGAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGAP.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 10.68% | -7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 22.07% | -10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.03% | 24.77% | -10.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 22.32% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 20.81% | -1.55% |
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGAP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison
LGAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.10% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.39% | 1.13% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 2.29% |
LGAP.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGAP.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGAP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGAP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.
LGAP.L tracks L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF, while IDFF.L tracks iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGAP.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.
Find the right allocation for LGAP.L and IDFF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer