VALW.L vs. SBUY.L
VALW.L (SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF) and SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VALW.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD while SBUY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VALW.L returned 14.58%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for SBUY.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VALW.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SBUY.L.
Performance
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VALW.L is traded in GBP, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALW.L achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 5.80% return.
VALW.L
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 47.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 14.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALW.L SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF | 19.31% | 27.01% | 5.92% | 16.43% | 0.09% | 20.68% | -18.17% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 5.80% | 21.60% | 14.64% | 9.46% | -0.90% | 21.36% | 12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALW.L and SBUY.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VALW.L and SBUY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Financial Services
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Industrials
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Healthcare
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Cyclical
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Communication Services
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Defensive
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Energy
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Basic Materials
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Utilities
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Real Estate
VALW.L
SBUY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank
VALW.L
SBUY.L
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VALW.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.95 | 2.62 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.39 | 3.61 | +1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.47 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.59 | 5.10 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.68 | 16.42 | +8.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VALW.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95 | 2.62 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.79 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALW.L and SBUY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALW.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.59% | -30.91% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | -4.79% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -17.76% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.24% | -17.76% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -3.99% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.49% | +0.39% |
Volatility
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.13%. This indicates that VALW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALW.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 2.13% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 7.00% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 9.84% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 13.73% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 15.52% | +1.16% |
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VALW.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison
VALW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.70% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
VALW.L SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VALW.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VALW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VALW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.
VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while SBUY.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VALW.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Find the right allocation for VALW.L and SBUY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer