PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALW.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VALW.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALW.L achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.41% return.


VALW.L

1D
1.06%
1M
10.28%
YTD
19.31%
6M
21.41%
1Y
47.31%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*

INFR.L

1D
0.88%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
9.41%
6M
7.19%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
19.31%27.01%5.92%16.43%0.09%20.68%-18.17%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.41%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VALW.L and INFR.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between VALW.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VALW.L
INFR.L

Technology

29.7%
0.7%

Financial Services

15.4%
0.0%

Industrials

12.4%
20.8%

Healthcare

9.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%

-

Communication Services

8.1%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

4.1%
16.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.7%
56.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
5.0%

Technology

VALW.L
29.7%
INFR.L
0.7%

Financial Services

VALW.L
15.4%
INFR.L
0.0%

Industrials

VALW.L
12.4%
INFR.L
20.8%

Healthcare

VALW.L
9.4%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VALW.L
8.3%
INFR.L

-

Communication Services

VALW.L
8.1%
INFR.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

VALW.L
4.9%
INFR.L

-

Energy

VALW.L
4.1%
INFR.L
16.4%

Basic Materials

VALW.L
3.2%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

VALW.L
2.7%
INFR.L
56.0%

Real Estate

VALW.L
1.8%
INFR.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALW.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALW.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.95

1.59

+2.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.39

2.25

+3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.27

+0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

3.08

+3.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.68

7.88

+16.80

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALW.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALW.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95

1.59

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.62

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.52

+0.16

Drawdowns

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALW.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALW.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

-34.25%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-5.19%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-11.08%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

-22.87%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.80%

+3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-6.12%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.03%

-0.15%

Volatility

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that VALW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALW.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.45%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

8.76%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

10.34%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

12.24%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

14.09%

+2.59%

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALW.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

VALW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VALW.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

VALW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VALW.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALW.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer