VALW.L vs. ELLE.L
VALW.L (SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF) and ELLE.L (Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VALW.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD while ELLE.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VALW.L returned 14.46%/yr vs 7.17%/yr for ELLE.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VALW.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ELLE.L.
Performance
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VALW.L is traded in GBP, while ELLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ELLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALW.L achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly higher than ELLE.L's 3.57% return.
VALW.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 9.99%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 46.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
ELLE.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 15.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALW.L SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF | 19.01% | 27.01% | 5.92% | 16.43% | 0.09% | 20.68% | -18.17% |
ELLE.L Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF | 3.57% | 12.41% | 11.30% | 10.91% | -6.46% | 17.68% | 13.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALW.L and ELLE.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, VALW.L and ELLE.L have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Financial Services
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Industrials
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Healthcare
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Consumer Cyclical
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Communication Services
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Consumer Defensive
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Energy
VALW.L
ELLE.L
-
Basic Materials
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Utilities
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Real Estate
VALW.L
ELLE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
VALW.L
ELLE.L
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VALW.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.26 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.51 | 1.97 | +4.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.41 | 6.88 | +17.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VALW.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | 1.44 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.89 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.20 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, which is greater than ELLE.L's maximum drawdown of -20.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALW.L and ELLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALW.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.59% | -20.30% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | -7.98% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -14.31% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.24% | -14.31% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -2.73% | +2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -3.25% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.29% | -0.41% |
Volatility
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) at 3.44%. This indicates that VALW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALW.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 3.44% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 8.88% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 10.97% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 19.28% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 23.84% | -7.16% |
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ELLE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VALW.L vs. ELLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALW.L nor ELLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VALW.L and ELLE.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELLE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELLE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VALW.L.
VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while ELLE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VALW.L and 0.20% for ELLE.L.
Find the right allocation for VALW.L and ELLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer