PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALW.L vs. BUYB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (BUYB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VALW.L is traded in GBP, while BUYB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BUYB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALW.L achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than BUYB.L's 5.82% return.


VALW.L

1D
1.06%
1M
10.28%
YTD
19.31%
6M
21.41%
1Y
47.31%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*

BUYB.L

1D
0.97%
1M
0.90%
YTD
5.82%
6M
7.84%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
19.31%27.01%5.92%16.43%0.09%20.68%-18.17%
BUYB.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
5.82%21.48%14.96%9.82%-0.88%20.91%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VALW.L and BUYB.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.79

The correlation between VALW.L and BUYB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VALW.L
BUYB.L

Technology

29.7%
7.6%

Financial Services

15.4%
32.9%

Industrials

12.4%
11.0%

Healthcare

9.4%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
15.8%

Communication Services

8.1%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
1.9%

Energy

4.1%
17.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.4%

Utilities

2.7%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.5%

Technology

VALW.L
29.7%
BUYB.L
7.6%

Financial Services

VALW.L
15.4%
BUYB.L
32.9%

Industrials

VALW.L
12.4%
BUYB.L
11.0%

Healthcare

VALW.L
9.4%
BUYB.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VALW.L
8.3%
BUYB.L
15.8%

Communication Services

VALW.L
8.1%
BUYB.L
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

VALW.L
4.9%
BUYB.L
1.9%

Energy

VALW.L
4.1%
BUYB.L
17.1%

Basic Materials

VALW.L
3.2%
BUYB.L
1.4%

Utilities

VALW.L
2.7%
BUYB.L
2.2%

Real Estate

VALW.L
1.8%
BUYB.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYB.L
BUYB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BUYB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (BUYB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALW.LBUYB.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.95

2.26

+1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.39

3.12

+2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.40

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

4.97

+1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.68

15.77

+8.91

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the BUYB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALW.L and BUYB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALW.LBUYB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95

2.26

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.73

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.79

-0.12

Drawdowns

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, smaller than the maximum BUYB.L drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALW.L and BUYB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALW.LBUYB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

-31.21%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-5.21%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-18.16%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

-18.16%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-4.08%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.64%

+0.24%

Volatility

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (BUYB.L) at 2.99%. This indicates that VALW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALW.LBUYB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.99%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

8.58%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

11.48%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

14.90%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

16.54%

+0.14%

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYB.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALW.L vs. BUYB.L - Dividend Comparison

VALW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUYB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUYB.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.70%1.85%1.84%1.71%1.92%1.22%1.51%1.84%1.35%1.18%1.72%1.30%
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VALW.L and BUYB.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BUYB.L.

VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while BUYB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VALW.L and 0.39% for BUYB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALW.L and BUYB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer