PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO).

VALT.TO and ZLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZLB.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011.

Performance

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VALT.TO
CI Gold Bullion Fund		8.41%60.46%25.58%12.35%0.92%-3.19%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.42%20.31%15.20%9.29%-0.46%21.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALT.TO achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 1.42% return.

VALT.TO

1D
4.34%
1M
-11.14%
YTD
8.41%
6M
20.41%
1Y
46.70%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*
—

ZLB.TO

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.74%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Gold Bullion Fund

BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Often compared with VALT.TO:
VALT.TO vs. KILO.TOVALT.TO vs. CGL.TOVALT.TO vs. ZGLD.TOVALT.TO vs. HUG.TOVALT.TO vs. CGL-C.TOVALT.TO vs. FBTCVALT.TO vs. VFV.TO
Often compared with ZLB.TO:
ZLB.TO vs. VDY.TOZLB.TO vs. XIU.TOZLB.TO vs. XDIV.TOZLB.TO vs. XMW.TOZLB.TO vs. XBAL.TOZLB.TO vs. XUT.TOZLB.TO vs. XUU-U.TO

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Return for Risk

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VALT.TO
VALT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VALT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VALT.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.48

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

1.99

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.57

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.19

8.71

+0.49

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALT.TO and ZLB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VALT.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.48

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.84

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

1.12

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between VALT.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

VALT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VALT.TO
CI Gold Bullion Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.92%1.93%2.28%2.56%2.56%2.29%2.72%2.34%2.65%2.42%2.82%2.25%

Drawdowns

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALT.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT.TO and ZLB.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

VALT.TOZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-33.96%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.47%

-6.53%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-13.04%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.96%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.51%

-3.08%

-10.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-2.51%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

1.93%

+3.38%

Volatility

VALT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 3.64%. This indicates that VALT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

VALT.TOZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.12%

3.64%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.22%

7.64%

+16.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.08%

10.52%

+17.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

9.57%

+8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

12.19%

+5.58%