VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO
VALT-U.TO (CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series)) and ZGLD.TO (BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units)) are both Gold funds. VALT-U.TO is actively managed, while ZGLD.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, VALT-U.TO returned 22.84% vs 21.33% for ZGLD.TO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VALT-U.TO is traded in USD, while ZGLD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZGLD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALT-U.TO achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly higher than ZGLD.TO's -7.32% return.
VALT-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -7.30%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- —
ZGLD.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -11.90%
- YTD
- -7.32%
- 6M
- -7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VALT-U.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) | -6.39% | 65.42% | 21.36% |
ZGLD.TO BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) | -7.32% | 63.27% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALT-U.TO and ZGLD.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VALT-U.TO and ZGLD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VALT-U.TO
ZGLD.TO
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) and BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALT-U.TO | ZGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.83 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 2.21 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALT-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than ZGLD.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT-U.TO and ZGLD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALT-U.TO | ZGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -25.82% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.65% | -25.82% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.72% | -25.58% | -12.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -4.19% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 9.68% | +4.62% |
Volatility
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) is 8.30%, while BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that VALT-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZGLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALT-U.TO | ZGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 8.92% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.00% | 23.30% | +15.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.49% | 27.13% | +14.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 21.68% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 21.68% | +0.71% |
Dividends
VALT-U.TO vs. ZGLD.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALT-U.TO nor ZGLD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VALT-U.TO and ZGLD.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and BMO.
Find the right allocation for VALT-U.TO and ZGLD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer