VALQ vs. EQLT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

VALQ (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF) and EQLT (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - VALQ tracks the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Value Index while EQLT tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VALQ returned 17.62% vs 47.25% for EQLT. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VALQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQLT.

Performance

VALQ vs. EQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF (VALQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALQ achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than EQLT's 25.30% return.

VALQ

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 2.65%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.86%

EQLT

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 15.96%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 1Y: 47.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	$66.04K	$56.95K	$121.40K
VALQ American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF	$217.95K	$474.87K	$401.20K

VALQ vs. EQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VALQ American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF	7.41%	10.58%	3.47%
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	25.30%	33.93%	-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VALQ and EQLT is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.46

VALQ vs. EQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VALQ	EQLT
Technology	34.6%	34.8%
Healthcare	14.8%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	12.1%	3.5%
Industrials	11.6%	11.4%
Communication Services	6.5%	5.2%
Financial Services	5.5%	19.5%
Energy	1.9%	3.5%
Basic Materials	0.7%	6.5%
Real Estate	0.3%	0.9%
Utilities	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

VALQ vs. EQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VALQ

VALQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
VALQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VALQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VALQ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VALQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VALQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

EQLT

EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 82
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VALQ vs. EQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF (VALQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VALQ	EQLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.03	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.63	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.96	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.47	11.90	-5.43

VALQ vs. EQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the EQLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALQ and EQLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VALQ vs. EQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALQ drawdown since its inception was -38.19%, which is greater than EQLT's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALQ and EQLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VALQ	EQLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.19%	-17.38%	-20.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.85%	-12.00%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-6.54%	+6.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-3.81%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	3.98%	-1.25%

Volatility

VALQ vs. EQLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF (VALQ) is 3.08%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VALQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VALQ	EQLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	6.29%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	21.12%	-13.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.16%	23.48%	-12.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	21.27%	-6.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.55%	21.27%	-3.72%

VALQ vs. EQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EQLT's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VALQ vs. EQLT - Dividend Comparison

VALQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than EQLT's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	2.80%	3.10%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VALQ American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF	1.78%	1.88%	1.58%	1.76%	2.71%	1.58%	2.08%	2.31%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VALQ and EQLT in my portfolio?

VALQ and EQLT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VALQ or EQLT?

EQLT has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VALQ (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALQ dropped -38.19% vs EQLT's -17.38%.

Which ETF is better, VALQ or EQLT?

On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 47.25% vs 17.62% for VALQ. On fees, VALQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VALQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VALQ or EQLT?

Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 47.25% return vs 17.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VALQ or EQLT?

VALQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VALQ or EQLT?

EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.78% for VALQ.

What is the main difference between VALQ and EQLT?

VALQ tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Value Index, while EQLT tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VALQ and 0.35% for EQLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.