PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALLX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Larger Companies Focused Fund (VALLX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALLX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's 4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VALLX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 14.60%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.92% annualized return.


VALLX

1D
2.34%
1M
-6.28%
6M
5.92%
YTD
0.78%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
14.60%
ALL TIME*
9.40%

MRFOX

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.50%
6M
3.84%
YTD
4.87%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
15.92%
ALL TIME*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VALLX
Value Line Larger Companies Focused Fund
0.78%28.38%26.35%59.06%-39.02%2.71%46.21%25.73%0.97%33.82%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
4.87%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VALLX and MRFOX is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between VALLX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALLX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VALLX
VALLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VALLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VALLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALLX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Larger Companies Focused Fund (VALLX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VALLXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.19

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.55

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

4.55

-3.98

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALLX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALLX drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALLX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALLXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-29.10%

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.39%

-7.03%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-7.91%

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.12%

-12.98%

-33.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.12%

-29.10%

-17.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.88%

-1.37%

-11.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-2.34%

-12.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

2.38%

+7.54%

Volatility

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

Value Line Larger Companies Focused Fund (VALLX) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 4.45%. This indicates that VALLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALLXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

4.45%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.98%

7.80%

+13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.44%

10.40%

+15.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.83%

12.17%

+15.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

14.18%

+11.46%

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALLX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALLX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

VALLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than MRFOX's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.54%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%
VALLX
Value Line Larger Companies Focused Fund
6.17%6.22%2.68%0.00%14.19%14.36%9.52%9.98%14.50%7.70%14.32%5.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


VALLX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VALLX has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to MRFOX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALLX dropped -53.36% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

MRFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALLX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer