VALG vs. XTJL
VALG (Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. VALG is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VALG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
VALG vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALG achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.60% return.
VALG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- -20.09%
- YTD
- 14.54%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 14.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VALG vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VALG Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF | 14.54% | 1.57% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.60% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALG and XTJL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALG vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
VALG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTJL
VALG vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALG vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALG drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALG and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -23.24% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.71% | -0.06% | -33.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.47% | -3.99% | -9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
VALG vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.84% | 7.35% | +67.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.84% | 15.13% | +59.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.84% | 15.13% | +59.71% |
VALG vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
VALG vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALG nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VALG and XTJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VALG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VALG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.
VALG and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VALG and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for VALG and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer