PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALG vs. PYPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALG vs. PYPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALG achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than PYPG's -23.41% return.


VALG

1D
-5.84%
1M
-22.49%
6M
-17.37%
YTD
3.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PYPG

1D
4.02%
1M
61.13%
6M
-18.36%
YTD
-23.41%
1Y
-56.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALG vs. PYPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VALG and PYPG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALG vs. PYPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PYPG
PYPG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PYPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALG vs. PYPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VALGPYPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

VALG vs. PYPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VALG vs. PYPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALG drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum PYPG drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALG and PYPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALGPYPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.01%

-79.52%

+38.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.05%

-61.72%

+21.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-41.31%

+25.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.30%

Volatility

VALG vs. PYPG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALGPYPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.56%

85.35%

-11.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.56%

83.28%

-9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.56%

83.28%

-9.72%

VALG vs. PYPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VALG and PYPG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

VALG vs. PYPG - Dividend Comparison

Neither VALG nor PYPG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VALG and PYPG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALG and PYPG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

VALG and PYPG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALG and PYPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer