PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALG vs. BMNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALG achieves a 35.93% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.


VALG

1D
-9.01%
1M
1.55%
YTD
35.93%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VALG and BMNG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VALG vs. BMNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALGBMNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

-0.52

+2.04

Drawdowns

VALG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALG drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALG and BMNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALGBMNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-95.36%

+58.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.33%

-95.36%

+74.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-81.38%

+69.64%

Volatility

VALG vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALGBMNGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.74%

191.58%

-115.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.74%

191.58%

-115.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.74%

191.58%

-115.84%

VALG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VALG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

VALG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither VALG nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VALG and BMNG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALG and BMNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

VALG and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALG and BMNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer