PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALAX vs. FALAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALAX vs. FALAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Al Frank Fund (VALAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VALAX having a 14.25% annualized return and FALAX not far behind at 13.87%.


VALAX

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.37%
YTD
21.52%
6M
23.95%
1Y
51.82%
3Y*
24.34%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
14.25%

FALAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALAX vs. FALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
21.52%23.57%13.35%14.05%-13.50%24.97%10.22%33.98%-7.87%18.09%
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
0.00%19.36%26.05%23.16%-8.16%25.49%8.56%31.37%-8.64%16.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VALAX and FALAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.93

Over the past year, the correlation between VALAX and FALAX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.93, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALAX vs. FALAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALAX
VALAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FALAX
FALAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALAX vs. FALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Al Frank Fund (VALAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALAXFALAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.85

1.88

+1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.16

2.64

+2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.50

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.06

6.01

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.28

10.90

+13.38

VALAX vs. FALAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the FALAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALAX and FALAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALAXFALAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

1.88

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.76

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.76

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.46

-0.03

Drawdowns

VALAX vs. FALAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALAX drawdown since its inception was -61.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FALAX drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALAX and FALAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALAXFALAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.26%

-63.41%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-5.05%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.81%

-18.92%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-21.62%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-37.55%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-4.19%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-13.96%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.78%

-0.64%

Volatility

VALAX vs. FALAX - Volatility Comparison

Al Frank Fund (VALAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that VALAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALAXFALAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

0.00%

+4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

4.22%

+6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

8.09%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

16.44%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

18.59%

+0.75%

VALAX vs. FALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FALAX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALAX vs. FALAX - Dividend Comparison

VALAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than FALAX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
6.03%6.03%6.33%3.46%2.21%6.69%5.50%8.65%17.32%6.41%2.11%3.02%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
7.12%8.65%10.32%5.95%8.62%6.83%7.17%13.51%10.73%10.66%5.32%9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


VALAX and FALAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VALAX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FALAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALAX dropped -61.26% vs FALAX's -63.41%.

VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALAX and FALAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer