PortfoliosLab logo
FALAX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FALAX and FBGRX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FALAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FALAX:

0.39

FBGRX:

0.17

Sortino Ratio

FALAX:

0.64

FBGRX:

0.42

Omega Ratio

FALAX:

1.10

FBGRX:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

FALAX:

0.36

FBGRX:

0.17

Martin Ratio

FALAX:

1.18

FBGRX:

0.50

Ulcer Index

FALAX:

6.50%

FBGRX:

9.25%

Daily Std Dev

FALAX:

20.48%

FBGRX:

28.66%

Max Drawdown

FALAX:

-62.96%

FBGRX:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

FALAX:

-5.73%

FBGRX:

-9.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FALAX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FALAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 6.45%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.


FALAX

YTD

3.72%

1M

12.63%

6M

-4.29%

1Y

7.90%

3Y*

13.51%

5Y*

15.35%

10Y*

6.45%

FBGRX

YTD

-4.69%

1M

17.03%

6M

-2.89%

1Y

4.78%

3Y*

20.05%

5Y*

13.12%

10Y*

12.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund

FALAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FALAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FALAX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FALAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FALAX is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FALAX is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FALAX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FALAX is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FALAX is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FALAX is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FALAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FALAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FALAX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FALAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FALAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than FBGRX's 0.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
0.51%0.53%0.74%1.11%1.64%1.79%1.93%1.76%1.13%1.10%0.87%5.11%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.24%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

FALAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FALAX drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALAX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FALAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) is 4.19%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FALAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...