PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than SPX5.L's 8.77% return.


VAGS.L

1D
0.31%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.31%
6M
1.01%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*

SPX5.L

1D
1.48%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
8.77%
6M
9.15%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.31%6.58%5.57%8.56%-12.52%-1.30%6.71%1.98%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
8.77%9.34%27.46%19.76%-9.00%30.96%13.52%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGS.L and SPX5.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

-0.04

The correlation between VAGS.L and SPX5.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAGS.LSPX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.67

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

13.26

-10.03

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGS.L and SPX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, smaller than the maximum SPX5.L drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and SPX5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAGS.LSPX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-41.23%

+24.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-7.07%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-20.90%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-20.90%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.82%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-7.47%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.96%

-1.02%

Volatility

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) is 1.41%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that VAGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAGS.LSPX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

3.60%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

7.54%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

10.78%

-7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

14.26%

-9.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

15.53%

-10.93%

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPX5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAGS.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison

VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.90%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%1.71%1.57%1.49%1.68%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%1.43%3.03%2.33%1.45%0.87%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAGS.L and SPX5.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAGS.L.

VAGS.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while SPX5.L is S&P 500. VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.09% for SPX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and SPX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer