VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L
VAGS.L (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating) and GLAB.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged) are both Global Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, from Vanguard and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VAGS.L returned -0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for GLAB.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than GLAB.L's 0.51% return.
VAGS.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAB.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating | 0.19% | 4.96% | 2.39% | 5.94% | -13.72% | -2.14% | 5.52% | 2.06% |
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 0.51% | 4.68% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -12.07% | -1.74% | 4.48% | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAGS.L and GLAB.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VAGS.L and GLAB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAGS.L
GLAB.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VAGS.L
GLAB.L
Basic Materials
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Communication Services
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Consumer Cyclical
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Consumer Defensive
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Energy
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Healthcare
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Industrials
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Real Estate
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Technology
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Utilities
VAGS.L
-
GLAB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L — Risk / Return Rank
VAGS.L
GLAB.L
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAGS.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 4.13 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAGS.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.05 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.33 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.99%, which is greater than GLAB.L's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and GLAB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAGS.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.99% | -15.68% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -2.29% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.93% | -3.51% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.60% | -15.45% | -2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -1.02% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -4.47% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.79% | +0.12% |
Volatility
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAGS.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 1.45% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.49% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 3.08% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 4.53% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 3.94% | +0.63% |
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VAGS.L and GLAB.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAGS.L vs. GLAB.L - Dividend Comparison
VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 3.10% | 3.06% | 2.70% | 1.91% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.88% |
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAGS.L and GLAB.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAGS.L and GLAB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street.
Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and GLAB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer