VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L
VAGS.L (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating) and ENCG.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAGS.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while ENCG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VAGS.L returned 3.76%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for ENCG.L. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. VAGS.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENCG.L.
Performance
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VAGS.L is traded in GBP, while ENCG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ENCG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAGS.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than ENCG.L's 24.41% return.
VAGS.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
ENCG.L
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 24.41%
- 6M
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating | 0.19% | 4.96% | 2.39% | 5.94% | -13.72% | -1.41% |
ENCG.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 24.41% | 0.89% | 5.39% | -7.83% | 38.17% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAGS.L and ENCG.L is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021 | -0.26 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between VAGS.L and ENCG.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.26 to -0.47, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAGS.L
ENCG.L
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
VAGS.L
ENCG.L
-
Basic Materials
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Communication Services
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Energy
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Healthcare
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Industrials
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Real Estate
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
Technology
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Utilities
VAGS.L
-
ENCG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VAGS.L
ENCG.L
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAGS.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 4.02 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 10.88 | -7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAGS.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.91 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.79 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAGS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.99%, smaller than the maximum ENCG.L drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGS.L and ENCG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAGS.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.99% | -26.32% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -8.38% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.93% | -17.11% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -4.28% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -13.09% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 3.11% | -2.20% |
Volatility
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) is 1.44%, while L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VAGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAGS.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 6.29% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 14.33% | -11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 17.67% | -14.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 18.12% | -13.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 18.12% | -13.55% |
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAGS.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VAGS.L vs. ENCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VAGS.L nor ENCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VAGS.L and ENCG.L have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCG.L.
VAGS.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while ENCG.L is Commodities. VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while ENCG.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGS.L and 0.30% for ENCG.L.
Find the right allocation for VAGS.L and ENCG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer