VADAX vs. MUHLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX).
VADAX is managed by Invesco. MUHLX is managed by Muhlenkamp. It was launched on Nov 1, 1988.
Performance
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VADAX Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A | -1.47% | 10.89% | 12.40% | 13.29% | -12.07% | 28.93% | 12.30% | 28.59% | -8.19% | 18.26% |
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 6.53% | 17.82% | 3.38% | 13.92% | 2.89% | 28.98% | 11.96% | 14.39% | -13.29% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VADAX achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 6.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VADAX having a 10.47% annualized return and MUHLX not far behind at 10.41%.
VADAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 10.07%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
MUHLX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VADAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VADAX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank
VADAX
MUHLX
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VADAX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 1.28 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 1.79 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.94 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 7.09 | -3.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VADAX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.28 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.80 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.51 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between VADAX and MUHLX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison
VADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than MUHLX's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VADAX Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A | 10.36% | 10.21% | 8.77% | 4.69% | 8.49% | 9.80% | 6.21% | 4.49% | 6.90% | 2.76% | 0.30% | 2.77% |
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 3.13% | 3.34% | 0.58% | 0.89% | 6.80% | 7.77% | 10.28% | 1.26% | 14.70% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 11.02% |
Drawdowns
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VADAX drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, roughly equal to the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VADAX and MUHLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VADAX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -62.05% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -10.23% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -18.63% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | -40.85% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -7.88% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -10.81% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.81% | -0.03% |
Volatility
VADAX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) is 3.76%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that VADAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VADAX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 5.35% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 11.84% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 16.73% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 14.73% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 17.02% | +1.51% |