PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3YA.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with V3YA.DE having a 10.95% return and 2B7K.DE slightly lower at 10.83%.


V3YA.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
6.20%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.28%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
10Y*

2B7K.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
5.71%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.69%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
V3YA.DE
Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.95%4.20%31.35%26.80%-17.33%
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
10.83%2.85%17.54%20.90%-12.75%

Correlation

The correlation between V3YA.DE and 2B7K.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022

0.91

The correlation between V3YA.DE and 2B7K.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3YA.DE
V3YA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
V3YA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3YA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3YA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
V3YA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3YA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3YA.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3YA.DE2B7K.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.37

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

8.64

+0.94

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3YA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3YA.DE and 2B7K.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3YA.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.48

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Drawdowns

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3YA.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown of -31.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3YA.DE and 2B7K.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3YA.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-31.65%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-7.81%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.84%

-21.29%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-5.16%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.15%

+0.52%

Volatility

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3YA.DE) is 3.17%, while iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that V3YA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7K.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3YA.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

3.69%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

9.21%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

12.48%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

14.60%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

16.18%

-0.60%

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3YA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7K.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3YA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither V3YA.DE nor 2B7K.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


V3YA.DE and 2B7K.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3YA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3YA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

V3YA.DE tracks FTSE North America All Cap Choice Index, while 2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for V3YA.DE and 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3YA.DE and 2B7K.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer