V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

V3PL.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing) and AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - V3PL.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice while AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PL.DE returned 19.01%/yr vs 22.86%/yr for AMEA.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. V3PL.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEA.DE.

Performance

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with V3PL.DE having a 31.53% return and AMEA.DE slightly higher at 31.99%.

V3PL.DE

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 10.39%
• YTD: 31.53%
• 6M: 33.98%
• 1Y: 50.34%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMEA.DE

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 7.99%
• YTD: 31.99%
• 6M: 34.41%
• 1Y: 55.18%
• 3Y*: 22.86%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 11.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
V3PL.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing	31.53%	16.39%	7.41%	10.31%	3.85%
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR	31.99%	18.01%	18.95%	3.12%	4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.68

The correlation between V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3PL.DE

V3PL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 86
V3PL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
V3PL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
V3PL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
V3PL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
V3PL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

AMEA.DE

AMEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
AMEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
AMEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AMEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AMEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	V3PL.DE	AMEA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.85	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	3.75	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.50	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	4.74	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.17	17.16	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3PL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the AMEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	V3PL.DE	AMEA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.85	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.56	+0.67

Drawdowns

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3PL.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, smaller than the maximum AMEA.DE drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3PL.DE	AMEA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.66%	-34.43%	+16.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.12%	-11.58%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.66%	-20.48%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-2.69%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-11.52%	+8.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.21%	-0.29%

Volatility

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) is 6.84%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that V3PL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3PL.DE	AMEA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	8.10%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.33%	16.15%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	19.29%	-1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	18.27%	-3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	18.97%	-3.73%

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3PL.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

V3PL.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

V3PL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
V3PL.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing	1.42%	1.90%	2.16%	2.13%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE in my portfolio?

V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3PL.DE or AMEA.DE?

On fees, V3PL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3PL.DE or AMEA.DE?

V3PL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.

What is the main difference between V3PL.DE and AMEA.DE?

V3PL.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PL.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.