V3PA.DE vs. SLV
V3PA.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - V3PA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PA.DE returned 19.30%/yr vs 38.02%/yr for SLV. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V3PA.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
V3PA.DE is traded in EUR, while SLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V3PA.DE achieves a 31.55% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -3.39% return.
V3PA.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 31.55%
- 6M
- 35.36%
- 1Y
- 51.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 85.71%
- 3Y*
- 38.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3PA.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 31.55% | 16.47% | 7.66% | 10.91% | 3.67% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -3.39% | 115.63% | 28.87% | -4.06% | 13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3PA.DE and SLV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V3PA.DE vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
V3PA.DE
SLV
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| V3PA.DE | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.30 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 1.98 | +2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 4.32 | +12.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3PA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PA.DE and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V3PA.DE | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -67.77% | +50.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -43.41% | +31.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | -43.41% | +25.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -40.02% | +38.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -36.96% | +34.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 19.90% | -16.82% |
Volatility
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) is 6.33%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that V3PA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V3PA.DE | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 15.26% | -8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.56% | 57.23% | -41.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 58.10% | -40.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 34.67% | -19.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 30.41% | -15.08% |
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3PA.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
V3PA.DE vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither V3PA.DE nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
V3PA.DE and SLV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3PA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3PA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
V3PA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SLV is Silver. V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PA.DE and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for V3PA.DE and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer