PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF USD Income (V3NM.L) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3NM.L is traded in GBP, while FSEM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FSEM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3NM.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than FSEM.L's 3.32% return.


V3NM.L

1D
0.19%
1M
6.47%
YTD
10.38%
6M
10.33%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
10Y*

FSEM.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.82%
YTD
3.32%
6M
2.73%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
V3NM.L
Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF USD Income
10.38%8.72%26.63%23.61%-13.01%
FSEM.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc
3.32%5.25%5.32%3.38%-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between V3NM.L and FSEM.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3NM.L
V3NM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
V3NM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3NM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3NM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
V3NM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3NM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEM.L
FSEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FSEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF USD Income (V3NM.L) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3NM.LFSEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.38

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

6.80

+3.34

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3NM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FSEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3NM.L and FSEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3NM.LFSEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.72

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.24

+0.69

Drawdowns

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3NM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.46%, which is greater than FSEM.L's maximum drawdown of -15.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3NM.L and FSEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3NM.LFSEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.46%

-15.36%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-5.70%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-9.08%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-1.12%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-6.53%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.00%

+0.87%

Volatility

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF USD Income (V3NM.L) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3NM.LFSEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.91%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

6.39%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

7.90%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

10.22%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

10.13%

+4.73%

Dividends

V3NM.L vs. FSEM.L - Dividend Comparison

V3NM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than FSEM.L's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FSEM.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc
7.90%6.31%6.49%5.74%5.01%2.41%
V3NM.L
Vanguard ESG North America All Cap UCITS ETF USD Income
0.73%0.80%0.85%1.06%0.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3NM.L and FSEM.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

V3NM.L is categorized as ESG, while FSEM.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3NM.L and FSEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer