FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L
FSEM.L (Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc) and EMGA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. FSEM.L is actively managed, while EMGA.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSEM.L returned 1.51%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for EMGA.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSEM.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EMGA.L.
Performance
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEM.L achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than EMGA.L's 0.91% return.
FSEM.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
EMGA.L
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEM.L Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc | 2.80% | 13.32% | 3.51% | 8.82% | -17.90% | 2.49% |
EMGA.L iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.91% | 18.25% | -2.74% | 11.65% | -10.95% | -3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEM.L and EMGA.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FSEM.L and EMGA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSEM.L
EMGA.L
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSEM.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.58 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 5.31 | +6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSEM.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.25 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.12 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.16 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EMGA.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEM.L and EMGA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEM.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.00% | -28.18% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.02% | -5.93% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.09% | -9.12% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.00% | -26.60% | -1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -2.40% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -8.98% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.77% | -0.66% |
Volatility
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSEM.L | EMGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.22% | 6.52% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.39% | 7.49% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.58% | 9.04% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 10.24% | -1.76% |
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEM.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSEM.L vs. EMGA.L - Dividend Comparison
FSEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, while EMGA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGA.L iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSEM.L Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc | 7.91% | 6.31% | 6.49% | 5.74% | 5.01% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSEM.L and EMGA.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSEM.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSEM.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMGA.L.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSEM.L and 0.50% for EMGA.L.
Find the right allocation for FSEM.L and EMGA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer