PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3GS.L vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3GS.L is traded in GBP, while BNDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNDX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GS.L achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.36% return.


V3GS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.77%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*

BNDX

1D
-0.89%
1M
-1.14%
6M
-0.44%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
1.13%
3Y*
3.01%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
1.17%10.46%7.79%12.25%-12.52%2.21%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.36%-4.46%5.38%3.33%-2.39%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GS.L and BNDX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3GS.L vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GS.L
V3GS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


V3GS.LBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.03

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

0.19

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.13

0.41

+9.72

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GS.L and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GS.L and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3GS.LBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.23%

-17.24%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-6.10%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.73%

-9.36%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.23%

-15.22%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-9.46%

+8.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-7.43%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

2.75%

-2.11%

Volatility

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) is 1.09%, while Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that V3GS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3GS.LBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

2.20%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

4.94%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

6.33%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

8.75%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

9.06%

-3.29%

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3GS.L vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

V3GS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than BNDX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.51%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
2.53%3.59%4.25%4.00%2.43%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3GS.L and BNDX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for V3GS.L.

V3GS.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while BNDX is Global Bonds. V3GS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GS.L and 0.07% for BNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3GS.L and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer