PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3GP.L is traded in GBP, while PLAN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PLAN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GP.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than PLAN.L's -1.45% return.


V3GP.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*

PLAN.L

1D
0.52%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
0.59%6.20%3.56%7.64%-14.57%-1.40%
PLAN.L
Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-1.45%19.94%-4.55%8.21%-13.65%-6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GP.L and PLAN.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.48

The correlation between V3GP.L and PLAN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GP.L
V3GP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PLAN.L
PLAN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PLAN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3GP.LPLAN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.28

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

3.54

+2.02

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the PLAN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GP.L and PLAN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3GP.LPLAN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.84

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.02

+0.13

Drawdowns

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.15%, smaller than the maximum PLAN.L drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GP.L and PLAN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3GP.LPLAN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.15%

-27.35%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-5.22%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.83%

-7.05%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-3.13%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-12.52%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.89%

-1.11%

Volatility

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) is 1.43%, while Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that V3GP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLAN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3GP.LPLAN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

2.04%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

5.71%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

7.95%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

9.86%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

9.86%

-4.44%

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PLAN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3GP.L vs. PLAN.L - Dividend Comparison

V3GP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while PLAN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PLAN.L
Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.43%4.36%4.10%2.48%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3GP.L and PLAN.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PLAN.L.

V3GP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while PLAN.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GP.L and 0.20% for PLAN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3GP.L and PLAN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer