PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3GD.L is traded in USD, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GD.L achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than VUSA.L's 10.25% return.


V3GD.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.81%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*

VUSA.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.62%
YTD
10.25%
6M
11.29%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
15.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
0.61%6.28%3.93%8.62%-13.27%1.15%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.25%17.65%25.21%26.13%-18.75%14.88%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GD.L and VUSA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.23

The correlation between V3GD.L and VUSA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GD.L
V3GD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3GD.LVUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.19

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

13.78

-7.82

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GD.L and VUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3GD.LVUSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.48

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.88

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.96

-0.75

Drawdowns

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum VUSA.L drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GD.L and VUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3GD.LVUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-33.50%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-8.69%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.65%

-18.45%

+14.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-25.32%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.54%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-3.71%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

2.02%

-1.26%

Volatility

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L) is 1.47%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that V3GD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3GD.LVUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.60%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

7.99%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

11.18%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

15.63%

-10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

16.21%

-10.73%

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3GD.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

V3GD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than VUSA.L's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.45%4.35%4.05%2.44%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.87%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3GD.L and VUSA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for V3GD.L.

V3GD.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while VUSA.L is S&P 500. V3GD.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GD.L and 0.07% for VUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3GD.L and VUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer