V3AB.L vs. UC79.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - V3AB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UC79.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, V3AB.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for UC79.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. V3AB.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.

Performance

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

V3AB.L is traded in GBP, while UC79.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC79.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3AB.L achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly lower than UC79.L's 33.24% return.

V3AB.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 6.33%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: —

UC79.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 8.63%
• YTD: 33.24%
• 6M: 35.28%
• 1Y: 64.62%
• 3Y*: 24.35%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	12.14%	12.22%	19.77%	17.95%	-11.67%	17.38%
UC79.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	33.24%	26.95%	10.88%	1.14%	-11.74%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between V3AB.L and UC79.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021	0.67

The correlation between V3AB.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	V3AB.L	UC79.L
Technology	33.9%	38.0%
Financial Services	17.7%	22.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	11.0%
Communication Services	10.0%	8.0%
Healthcare	9.7%	3.6%
Industrials	6.4%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	2.8%
Basic Materials	3.4%	3.3%
Real Estate	3.0%	1.3%
Utilities	0.4%	1.0%
Energy	0.0%	0.2%

Return for Risk

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3AB.L

V3AB.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
V3AB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
V3AB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
V3AB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
V3AB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
V3AB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

UC79.L

UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	V3AB.L	UC79.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.44	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	2.27	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.57	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	2.48	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.42	4.47	+10.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3AB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the UC79.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3AB.L and UC79.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	V3AB.L	UC79.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	1.44	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.41	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.15	+0.77

Drawdowns

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3AB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -53.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AB.L and UC79.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3AB.L	UC79.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.00%	-53.04%	+34.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-25.91%	+17.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.00%	-25.91%	+6.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.00%	-25.91%	+6.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-2.45%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-21.80%	+17.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	14.42%	-12.46%

Volatility

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) is 3.38%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that V3AB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3AB.L	UC79.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	8.44%	-5.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	15.21%	-6.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	44.59%	-32.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.72%	24.99%	-11.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.67%	25.01%	-11.34%

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3AB.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

V3AB.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison

V3AB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC79.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	1.59%	2.14%	1.79%	2.38%	2.06%	1.35%	1.81%	2.11%	2.11%	1.97%	2.15%	1.60%
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3AB.L and UC79.L in my portfolio?

V3AB.L and UC79.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3AB.L or UC79.L?

On fees, V3AB.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3AB.L or UC79.L?

V3AB.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for UC79.L.

What is the main difference between V3AB.L and UC79.L?

V3AB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UC79.L is Emerging Markets Equities. V3AB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UC79.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3AB.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.