PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3AA.DE achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.


V3AA.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.35%
YTD
12.77%
6M
13.07%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*

XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.64%
1Y
0.46%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3AA.DE
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
12.77%7.60%24.41%20.63%-18.04%20.19%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%18.35%

Correlation

The correlation between V3AA.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between V3AA.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3AA.DE
V3AA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
V3AA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3AA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3AA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
V3AA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3AA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3AA.DEXDEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.00

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

-0.02

+3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

-0.03

+13.36

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3AA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3AA.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3AA.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

-0.01

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.61

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.70

+0.13

Drawdowns

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3AA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.DE drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AA.DE and XDEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3AA.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.30%

-28.57%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-5.31%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.30%

-13.02%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

-13.02%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-6.53%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-5.03%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.37%

-0.34%

Volatility

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that V3AA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3AA.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.63%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

5.56%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

7.86%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

10.16%

+4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

12.03%

+2.30%

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3AA.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3AA.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither V3AA.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


V3AA.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3AA.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3AA.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

V3AA.DE tracks FTSE Global All Cap Choice Index, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3AA.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3AA.DE and XDEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer