V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE
V0IH.DE (VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A) and WRNW.DE (WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - V0IH.DE tracks the MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped while WRNW.DE tracks the WisdomTree Renewable Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, V0IH.DE returned 95.72% vs 107.60% for WRNW.DE. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V0IH.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WRNW.DE.
Performance
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V0IH.DE achieves a 55.27% return, which is significantly higher than WRNW.DE's 30.17% return.
V0IH.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 6M
- 44.59%
- 1Y
- 95.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRNW.DE
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 30.17%
- 6M
- 29.38%
- 1Y
- 107.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
V0IH.DE VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A | 55.27% | -0.77% | -6.42% | 15.33% |
WRNW.DE WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc | 30.17% | 51.49% | -23.68% | -12.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between V0IH.DE and WRNW.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023 | 0.30 |
The correlation between V0IH.DE and WRNW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
V0IH.DE
WRNW.DE
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V0IH.DE | WRNW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.49 | 7.07 | +3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 23.97 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V0IH.DE | WRNW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 3.54 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.37 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V0IH.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, smaller than the maximum WRNW.DE drawdown of -49.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V0IH.DE and WRNW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V0IH.DE | WRNW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.39% | -49.14% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -15.04% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -4.04% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -20.88% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 4.44% | -0.62% |
Volatility
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) is 8.79%, while WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that V0IH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRNW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V0IH.DE | WRNW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 10.28% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.57% | 19.33% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 30.01% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 26.02% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 26.02% | +3.67% |
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
V0IH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WRNW.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
V0IH.DE vs. WRNW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither V0IH.DE nor WRNW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
V0IH.DE and WRNW.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V0IH.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V0IH.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WRNW.DE.
V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while WRNW.DE tracks WisdomTree Renewable Energy. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for V0IH.DE and 0.45% for WRNW.DE.
Find the right allocation for V0IH.DE and WRNW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer