PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V0IH.DE achieves a 35.71% return, which is significantly higher than QUTM.DE's 23.86% return.


V0IH.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.74%
YTD
35.71%
6M
37.62%
1Y
69.95%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
10Y*

QUTM.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
23.86%
6M
22.33%
1Y
49.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
V0IH.DE
VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A
35.71%31.85%
QUTM.DE
VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc
23.86%14.27%

Correlation

The correlation between V0IH.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V0IH.DE
V0IH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
V0IH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QUTM.DE
QUTM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


V0IH.DEQUTM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

1.99

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

4.79

+11.05

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V0IH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V0IH.DE and QUTM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V0IH.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V0IH.DE and QUTM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V0IH.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.39%

-24.77%

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.07%

-24.77%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.07%

-11.10%

-4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.66%

-7.79%

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

10.29%

-5.86%

Volatility

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) is 9.41%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that V0IH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V0IH.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

12.75%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.35%

24.53%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.57%

33.64%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.55%

33.19%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.55%

33.19%

-2.64%

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

V0IH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

V0IH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither V0IH.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


V0IH.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V0IH.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V0IH.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

V0IH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for V0IH.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V0IH.DE and QUTM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer