PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYM vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYM vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 27.95% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UYM having a 12.48% annualized return and UTES not far behind at 12.27%.


UYM

1D
3.74%
1M
1.10%
YTD
27.95%
6M
30.38%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
12.48%

UTES

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.49%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYM vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
27.95%9.46%-8.00%17.47%-23.10%54.58%16.56%35.09%-35.68%51.51%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.26%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and UTES is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.30

The correlation between UYM and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UYM vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UYM
UTES

Basic Materials

87.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Industrials

1.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Basic Materials

UYM
87.6%
UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

UYM
12.4%
UTES

-

Industrials

UYM
1.1%
UTES

-

Communication Services

UYM

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

UYM

-

UTES

-

Energy

UYM

-

UTES

-

Financial Services

UYM

-

UTES

-

Healthcare

UYM

-

UTES

-

Real Estate

UYM

-

UTES

-

Technology

UYM

-

UTES

-

Utilities

UYM

-

UTES
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYM vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UYMUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.60

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

1.32

+2.34

UYM vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UYM vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYMUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-35.39%

-57.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.85%

-13.88%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.88%

-17.62%

-26.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.25%

-20.40%

-27.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.31%

-35.39%

-37.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-9.10%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-5.53%

-36.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

6.29%

+2.66%

Volatility

UYM vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.23%. This indicates that UYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYMUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

7.23%

+6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.29%

17.05%

+10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.09%

21.32%

+13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.49%

20.62%

+18.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.86%

20.17%

+22.69%

UYM vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

UYM vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than UTES's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.19%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYM and UTES have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UYM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to UTES (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UYM leads with 12.48% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UYM has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYM.

UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.19% for UYM.

UYM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYM and 0.49% for UTES.

UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYM and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer