UYM vs. UTES
UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. UYM is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, UYM returned 12.48%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for UTES. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
UYM vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 27.95% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UYM having a 12.48% annualized return and UTES not far behind at 12.27%.
UYM
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 27.95%
- 6M
- 30.38%
- 1Y
- 36.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
UYM vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 27.95% | 9.46% | -8.00% | 17.47% | -23.10% | 54.58% | 16.56% | 35.09% | -35.68% | 51.51% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYM and UTES is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.30 |
The correlation between UYM and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UYM vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UYM
UTES
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
UYM
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
UYM
UTES
-
Industrials
UYM
UTES
-
Communication Services
UYM
-
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
UYM
-
UTES
-
Energy
UYM
-
UTES
-
Financial Services
UYM
-
UTES
-
Healthcare
UYM
-
UTES
-
Real Estate
UYM
-
UTES
-
Technology
UYM
-
UTES
-
Utilities
UYM
-
UTES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYM vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
UYM
UTES
UYM vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UYM | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.60 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 1.32 | +2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UYM vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYM | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.77% | -35.39% | -57.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.85% | -13.88% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.88% | -17.62% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.25% | -20.40% | -27.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.31% | -35.39% | -37.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -9.10% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.06% | -5.53% | -36.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.95% | 6.29% | +2.66% |
Volatility
UYM vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.23%. This indicates that UYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYM | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.01% | 7.23% | +6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.29% | 17.05% | +10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.09% | 21.32% | +13.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.49% | 20.62% | +18.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.86% | 20.17% | +22.69% |
UYM vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYM vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than UTES's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 1.19% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 0.28% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.38% | 0.55% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYM and UTES have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UYM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to UTES (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, UYM leads with 12.48% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UYM has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYM.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.19% for UYM.
UYM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYM and 0.49% for UTES.
UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UYM and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer